Alexander II and Reform Essay - PHDessay.com.
Alexander III believed that for this to be unchallenged during his reign, the reforms of Alexander II had to be withdrawn. It was not possible to reverse the emancipation of the serfs but it was possible to reverse the power of the zemstva (local councils) and under Alexander III, their powers were distinctly curbed and handed to the Ministry of the Interior.
On the one hand Alexander II started “Great Reforms” and maintained the system by introducing “soften” laws, but on the other hand Alexander III disapproved such way of ruling and implemented rigorous reforms, while society expresses the opinion that “Great Reforms” implemented by “Tsar Liberator” were not enough and they demanded deepening of them.
Alexander II 45 The army, though defeated, was intact and loyal. In fact, only a small proportion had seen service in the Crimea. Fresh line divisions had re-mained inactive in Poland and the Caucasus. Alexander could still call upon the services of some enlightened if now venerable reformers from.
Talking of Reforms that Failed: Some Ideas about Alexander’s “Secret Committee. The paper considers an example of Alexander I’s reforms at the very beginning of the nineteenth century.
This lead to him wanting to continue to be around conservative ministers such a Pobodenostev because he knew that if having been surrounded by the best people with a similar mind provides him, they too would want to invert the reforms of Alexander II contrary to the ones that he usually were which was a mix of conservative and Liberal ministers that were affecting the changes to begin with.
Alexander III came to the throne abruptly in March 1884, aged 36, after his father's assassination at the hands of The People's Will. As the second son of Alexander II he had not been educated and prepared for the Tsardom as a child, until 1865 when his elder brother died and he became heir to the Tsardom.
Alexander II's Other Reforms: Introduction Students get into role as government advisors and consider the merits and drawbacks of various possible reforms. They take a class vote and they can then compare these ideas to what was ultimately decided to reach a deeper judgement on the value of Alexander's reforms.